1. Did Wizards of the Coast recognize before this that the OGL1.0a was commonly understood across the entire industry to be irrevocable, and that even they as an organization had stated this previously?
2. If the OGL 1.1 was the result of a multi-year internal project examining these questions, why was it seemingly ignorant of the variety of ways the OGL 1.0a was being used in the industry. Or were things like OpenD6 considered collateral damage?
3. If the intent was to stop megacorps from abusing your IP, why was there so much focus on crowdfunding?
4. Why was there seemingly no investigation of leveraging trademarks to do so much of this?