Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   feld (feld@bikeshed.party)'s status on Sunday, 22-Jan-2023 07:06:59 JST feld
   AI lawyers trained on all case law precedent would be wild
   • Embed this notice
     on-lain ✔ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ (lain@lain.com)'s status on Sunday, 22-Jan-2023 07:06:58 JST on-lain ✔ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

     in reply to
     @feld wonder how they'd deal with the issues this essay is about: https://web.archive.org/web/20180704034618/http://faculty.msb.edu/hasnasj/GTWebSite/MythWeb.htm
   • Embed this notice
     feld (feld@bikeshed.party)'s status on Sunday, 22-Jan-2023 08:31:21 JST feld

     in reply to

     • on-lain ✔ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ
     I'll have to read through this
     on-lain ✔ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     on-lain ✔ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ (lain@lain.com)'s status on Sunday, 22-Jan-2023 08:56:11 JST on-lain ✔ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

     in reply to

     • Hyolobrikator
     @Hyolobrika @feld the essay is about the deeper issue that the whole thing (uncorrupted rule of law) is a myth that can't even exist in theory, which is going further than just saying 'it's less optimal than we'd hope'
   • Embed this notice
     Hyolobrikator (hyolobrika@gleasonator.com)'s status on Sunday, 22-Jan-2023 08:56:12 JST Hyolobrikator

     in reply to

     • on-lain ✔ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ
     @lain @feld Didn't read all the way through but he's ignoring the fact-value gap. The public simultaneously think that there *should* be no corruption and that there *is* corruption. No doublethink there.