Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   寮 (ryo@social.076.moe)'s status on Thursday, 19-Jan-2023 23:52:01 JST 寮

   in reply to

   • scroll
   > This is just as dishonorable as fat people demands like "everyone else should order double because 'muh fat acceptance'."
   
   You're comparing apples with oranges here.
   
   > The sentence I'm replying to betrays the lack of a strong moral backbone
   
   Muh morality.
   That's the right wing version of "being on the right side of history", literally the exact same thing.
   
   > and is even in conflict with basic ancap principles.
   
   I guess you're misunderstanding spectacularly here.
   One such example would be child support.
   When parents are divorsed, traditionally the father has to pay for child support until the child becomes an adult.
   In the west now that women are making money, now they decided that the mother needs to pay for child support, so now the man's problem is a woman's problem.
   And from what I understood, they're now abolishing child support all of the sudden.
   If it's untrue, then just treat it like an example.
   If it's true, then also treat it like an example.
   • Embed this notice
     scroll (scroll@social.076.moe)'s status on Thursday, 19-Jan-2023 23:52:02 JST scroll
     "And this is why the smart people turn a man's problem into a woman's problem, and wait until soyciety fixes itself."
     
     This is just as dishonorable as fat people demands like "everyone else should order double because 'muh fat acceptance'." The sentence I'm replying to betrays the lack of a strong moral backbone and is even in conflict with basic ancap principles. See also: https://yujiri.xyz/protagonism/luck.gmi
     
     "A is chased by a bear and B could make the bear chase them instead. They doesn't; they chooses their own life over A's. Few people would claim this is immoral, and those that would (mostly Christians) would find it a minor sin at worst. Then the other version: it's A who has the power, and they choose to make the bear chase B instead. This one is obviously murder. We just can't honestly deny that there's a massive difference. There's no avoiding the conclusion that, even if you don't put it this way, A is less entitled to life *because* they're the one who would naturally die here."