GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    JB Emmons (intllawgnome@law.builders)'s status on Monday, 16-Jan-2023 23:28:44 JST JB Emmons JB Emmons

    This story has become an actual scandal for Biden, and legitimately so.

    One can obviously draw contrasts to the Trump situation. The former doesn't raise all of the concerns triggered by the latter, such as affirmative efforts to knowingly prevent the US government's recovery of classified docs.

    But both stories touch on concerns about improper handling of classified docs, whether or not intentional. And that can't be hand-waved away.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/14/us/biden-classified-documents-delaware.html

    In conversation Monday, 16-Jan-2023 23:28:44 JST from law.builders permalink
    • Embed this notice
      JB Emmons (intllawgnome@law.builders)'s status on Monday, 16-Jan-2023 23:28:41 JST JB Emmons JB Emmons
      in reply to
      • emptywheel

      I'm also finding @emptywheel 's analysis persuasive as usual, which leads to this conclusion: "Taking classified documents unknowingly is probably not a crime, especially for a President or Vice President. Refusing to give them back may well be. That’s the question before Jack Smith, as well as the obstruction question. That’s probably the question before Robert Hur."

      Marcy's thinking as to why this is so is worth your time:
      https://www.emptywheel.net/2023/01/15/why-trumps-lawyer-evan-corcoran-thinks-joe-biden-didnt-violate-18-usc-1924/

      In conversation Monday, 16-Jan-2023 23:28:41 JST permalink

      Attachments

      1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.emptywheel.net
        Why Trump's Lawyer, Evan Corcoran, Says Joe Biden Couldn't Violate 18 USC 1924 - emptywheel
        from @emptywheel
        Trump's lawyer, Evan Corcoran, argued last May that 18 USC 1924 -- which many Twitter experts claim is at issue with Biden's classified documents -- cannot apply to the President. If his analysis is correct, it also cannot apply to the Vice President.
    • Embed this notice
      JB Emmons (intllawgnome@law.builders)'s status on Monday, 16-Jan-2023 23:28:42 JST JB Emmons JB Emmons
      in reply to
      • NatlSecCnslrs

      From a criminal-law perspective, of course, I can't and won't counter anything Kel @NatlSecCnslrs says here. He knows this area far better than I do, and his take seems reasonable on its face. I recommend reading it.

      https://mstdn.social/@NatlSecCnslrs/109688878625174036

      In conversation Monday, 16-Jan-2023 23:28:42 JST permalink
      Nicholas Sarwark repeated this.
    • Embed this notice
      JB Emmons (intllawgnome@law.builders)'s status on Monday, 16-Jan-2023 23:28:43 JST JB Emmons JB Emmons
      in reply to

      Bad actors will both-sides this story in an effort to downplay the qualitatively worse actions taken by Trump.

      But the antidote to that is not to countervailingly insist that the Biden classified-docs scandal is a nothingburger.

      The better approach is to acknowledge that this was indeed a serious problem--probably not as bad as the Trump situation, but serious nonetheless. Keeping in mind that an average-joe gov't worker would face severe scrutiny if classified docs were found in his garage.

      In conversation Monday, 16-Jan-2023 23:28:43 JST permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.