Debating whether or not Republicans *really* want to erect a cruel regime of merciless white patriarchal dominance is futile. The proof is in the pudding, and the pudding is the state level: Wherever they are in charge, they are embracing an authoritarian vision of society. (Thread!)
Too many moderates, centrists, and liberals have bought into the idea that conservatives are just – and at least somewhat justifiably – pushing back against certain “excesses” of “woke” leftism, and that they will stop once those excesses are kept in check. That’s nonsense. 11/
Republican-led states and communities undermine democracy and entrench white reactionary rule, with or without the support of a majority of voters; the Supreme Court says: Keep going! All Republicans in Congress have to do is block any national counter-legislation. 10/
Ideally, the Supreme Court would step in and put a stop to the escalating attempts to undermine democracy and roll back civil rights. But the conservative majority on the Court is doing the opposite, acting instead as the spearhead of the reactionary counter-mobilization. 9/
This is not the doing of nihilists and chaos agents. It is the work of committed ideologues, fully determined to impose their reactionary vision of what America should be on as many people as possible and to punish those who dare to deviate and dissent. 8/
Conservatives are pursuing a deeply anti-democratic, anti-liberal, anti-pluralistic vision for American society, and the Right has a clear strategy for how to impose it on the country against majority will. They are fully committed to this reactionary political project. 6/
Let’s be clear: The country is the United States of America, and it is the twentieth century, any time before the 1960s rights revolution - that’s the vision.
Mercilessly restore and entrench traditional hierarchies of race, gender, religion, and wealth - that’s the project. 5/
The Republicans seem to have a high tolerance for hypocrisy within their in-group, and an intolerant stance for the exact same conduct for people outside their groups.
Closeted Boomers who've married and had children always have a rough time coming to terms with reality.
I would normally just wish them well, but given the egregious nationwide harm he did I'm surprised he's not doing public penance. He was alive, divorced, and seemingly practicing low key law last time I looked.
Henderson, a father of eight who busied himself drafting homophobic legislation for Jay Sekulow's ACLJ, was going by the name "Chip" as he was plying two seventeen year olds with drugs and alcohol in exchange for the occasional spit roasting.
I've got a couple videos, one of the boys getting his actual name off his vehicle registration, and another with him, them, and the vehicle's plate.
That crap used to get drafted by an attorney at ACLJ named James M. Henderson. They ghosted him when he got caught bartering alcohol/drugs to a couple of underage boys in exchange for sex.
That’s what the term “backlash” suggests, and why we need to be skeptical about a “backlash” narrative that tends to put the agency solely with traditionally marginalized groups - who are therefore ultimately at fault for causing an inevitable reaction. 12/
What we are up against is an escalating counter-mobilization: Reactionaries are actively mobilizing, they are deliberately pursuing a political project. They have agency – and therefore should be held accountable for the policies they support. 13/ https://thomaszimmer.substack.com/p/democracy-faces-a-reactionary-counter
At the heart of the reactionary project is the refusal of resentful people to compromise with the vision of egalitarian multiracial pluralism, with anyone who deviates from their idea of the natural/divinely ordained white patriarchal order, because they feel entitled to dominate all spheres of life. 14/
These people won’t stop because they have an epiphany that they shouldn’t go *that* far. They will either *be stopped* - or install a system in which only they and those who reflect their image back at them are entitled to rule and are recognized as equal. /end
Ideally, the Supreme Court would step in and put a stop to the escalating attempts to undermine democracy and roll back civil rights. But the conservative majority on the Court is doing the opposite, acting instead as the spearhead of the reactionary counter-mobilization@tzimmer_history I'm reading this in July 2024, and ... yeah.