@lxo @randahl @genziana @benroyce
There is a massive, massive difference between facts and lies. You're suggestion that it's all the same is post-truth propaganda. Very popular in the age of Trump, but it has no place here. You may want to believe that your feelings trump facts, but they don't.
Debunking lies is something else, though. And your narrative hangs together from easily debunked lies.
You can try to weasel your way out of that, but that's not going to work here.
Ha, you're the one making up these narratives. Either you're paid to spread Kremlin propaganda, or you fell for it. You're not insensitive to it at all; you're gullible to it. You lack critical thinking.
Let me show you some examples of what you said:
You're suggesting (though cowardly not literally claiming) that the reason Russia wants to control eastern Europe is because of US propaganda. That makes no sense, but is also blatantly untrue. It's Russia itself that's openly beating the war drum, and being explicit about wanting to control other countries. And that's nothing new; it was like that even before the US existed.
This is actually exactly what Europe is doing: keeping the US from bullying Europe and opposed to Russia. And Europe allies with other victims of Russian bullying, like Ukraine.
But what you're trying to suggest here is that Europe should ally with Russia against the US. You know very well that Europe is not that stupid. Russia has a history of bullying and attacking its allies. You're not safe as Russia's ally. You're not even safe as Russia's vassal. Russia is openly hostile to Europe. The only situation in which you can ally with a country like that, is when you're in an existential war against a third power that's invading you both, as was the case in WW2. But that alliance came at the very steep cost of sacrificing eastern Europe to Russian opression. Never again.
Here you're implying that the West provoked this war. That is blatantly untrue. The West could have done more to dissuade Putin by hard guarantees to defend Ukraine. They failed to do that, but that's not the same as provoking.
Or this piece of bullshit:
You imply that Europe is weakening itself by helping Ukraine (it's not), or that it makes us vulnerable to US aggression (unimaginable before Trump, but we were already vulnerable and are actually strengthening ourselves by getting more organised without the US), that we should ally with Russia (a ludicrous suggestion; they are our primary enemy, and not interested in allies, only in vassals). And besides, NATO without the US is already the second strongest military in the world. The only thing we need is to get more organised, to integrate our military, and put up a united front. An alliance with Russia accomplishes none of those things, but rather the opposite.
Every argument you make comes down to suggesting that Europe should abandon Ukraine and support Russia, despite their aggression against European countries.
In the late 1990s, it actually did look like Russia might become our ally. The Cold War was over, Russia participated in a NATO exercise, the US and Russia, together with many other countries, were cooperating on the ISS. And then Putin came to power, and made it clear he didn't respect European countries as equals. Europe still desperately tried to treat Russia as an equal trading partner, even after their invasion of Crimea and Donbas (which should really have been a massive warning, but western Europe was naive). It only got us more hostility.
Our words against Putin are not propaganda, they're experience. You're a fool if you trust Putin.
That might be said about many countries.
In these #US, however, it is not an epidemic, but a grand plan:
👉The #DumbingOfAmerica: The #StultificationOfThePeople👈, partof #Reagonomics:
@HistoPol 🔗 https://mastodon.social/users/HistoPol/statuses/114826006212505439
That might be said about many countries.
In these #US, however, it is not an epidemic, but a grand plan:
👉The #DumbingOfAmerica: The #StultificationOfThePeople👈, part of #Reagonomics:
@HistoPol 🔗 https://mastodon.social/users/HistoPol/statuses/114826006212505439
those were the lines i was thinking along.
i love the background of it.
Wendy is a given name generally given to girls in English-speaking countries.
In Britain during the English Civil War in the mid-1600s, a male Captain Wendy Oxford was identified by the Leveller John Lilburne as a spy reporting on his activities.[1][2] It was also used as a surname in Britain from at least the 17th century.[3] Its popularity in Britain as a feminine name is owed to the character Wendy Darling from the 1904 play Peter Pan and its 1911 novelisation Peter and Wendy, both by J. M. Barrie.[4][5][6] Its popularity reached a peak in the 1960s, and subsequently declined.[7] The name was inspired by young Margaret Henley, daughter of Barrie's poet friend W. E. Henley. Margaret reportedly used to call Barrie "my friendy", with the common childhood difficulty pronouncing Rs this came out as "my fwendy" and "my fwendy-wendy".[8][9]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendy
Wendy Darling
Vulture capitalists praying for the downfall of a legitimate central banking system, pretend that Bitcoin is widely useful in those countries.
In those situations, I say "Do what you need to survive." 👍🏿
But what would you use Bitcoin for in a stable country with a fast, free, open, and zero cost micro transaction system like UPI?
#Germany's domestic intelligence agency has warned against a cyber group belonging to Russian military intelligence (#GRU) Unit 29155, saying it has carried out cyberattacks against #NATO and #EU countries.
In its warning, the intelligence agency said the group, also known as Cadet Blizzard or Ember Bear, conducts activities for the purpose of espionage and sabotage that often involve defacing websites and publishing stolen data.
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.