I'm convinced someone just grepped commit messages for this and submitted a #CVE and there was nothing and no one that even tried to confirm or check that this was actually legitimate. There was no filter in place and it was incorrectly let through. That's why it should be rejected. Saying it is "disputed" hints that there can be different views on this subject.
So, you are asking me to explain how this not identified vulnerability is actually not identifying a vulnerability.
#Today I decided to check if I was missing the bird-site.
First thing I saw was Van Morrisons still flinging his Covid conspiracy nonsense around like poop in a monkey-house and sneeringly demand Billy Bragg answers his brain-dead questions on the subject.
So many people were calling him a hero and a genius.
Turns out I do not miss the bird-site.
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.