Okay, and the old joke was:
If I'm pitching to academia or marketing, it's AI.
If I'm pitching to a company exec it's ML.
If I'm actually writing it then it is logistic regression.
AI has gone through iterations on how "cool" it is, but a lot of things start out as "AI" and then get classified as something else. A lot of it rooted in academia. I have an article I saved somewhere that goes into how "AI" can replace our jobs.
They are talking about expert systems, which most people would barely even consider "AI" today, but _were_ solidly considered AI at the time.
Like, roll your eyes at it, sure. But it _isn't the same criticism_ as using generative AI, or using stolen data, or whatever else. Conflating the criticisms does no one any favors.
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.