hall1995.pdf

Notices where this attachment appears

1. Embed this notice
   pistolero (p@fsebugoutzone.org)'s status on Monday, 28-Jul-2025 14:55:43 JST pistolero

   in reply to
   @ceo_of_monoeye_dating @Aldo2 @Alice @ChristiJunior @Kyonko802 @RedTechEngineer @lina Yeah, it's usually not worth digging it up. Just tell the pedos to cite primary data or fuck off: they will either abruptly change topic, or they'll actually cite something. If they can produce a PDF, then it'll be something they won't challenge: either you're making their case for them, or they'll screech about it. The people that are pushing something rely on trying to convince idiots while attempting to make non-idiots do more work than they have to do; I don't regret looking it up. Pedos and Nazis are especially egregious about this. They make the claim, they can back up the claim. The primary sources are usually less conclusive than you'd hope.
   differentiation_of_homicidal_child_molesters,_nonhomocidal_child_molesters,_and_nonoffenders--firestone2000.pdf
   fedora1992.pdf
   hall1995.pdf