GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Figure 16: Regions of instability below 1020 km for the March 2025 population of intact objects using updated stability model. from Lewis and Kessler's paper https://conference.sdo.esoc.esa.int/proceedings/sdc9/paper/305/SDC9-paper305.pdf This is a graph showing that the number of intact objects exceeds the "runaway threshold" between altitudes of roughly 520 and 1000 kilometers, and the "unstable threshold" between 400 and 1000 kilometers.

Download link

https://media.mathstodon.xyz/media_attachments/files/114/765/779/897/391/512/original/de57185f9ded8d27.jpg

Notices where this attachment appears

  1. Embed this notice
    John Carlos Baez (johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz)'s status on Sunday, 29-Jun-2025 23:01:48 JST John Carlos Baez John Carlos Baez

    If you're the kind of person who follows me, you may know about the Kessler Syndrome.

    That's when collisions between satellites and space junk create enough debris to cause *more* collisions, leading to a runaway chain reaction. This could render certain regions of near-Earth space unusable!

    It's one of nature's ways of containing stupid civilizations, sort of like how inflammation contains infections. So don't be surprised:

    A new study by Lewis and Kessler argues that we've hit the "runaway threshold" - the point where a chain reaction is expected - at nearly all altitudes between 520 and 1000 kilometers.

    Below that, or above that, space could remain usable. So we could still get out and ruin other layers of space - or go to other planets and mess up those. Luckily, planned deployments of large satellite constellations like Starlink, Amazon's Project Kuiper, etc. will reduce the risk of such a breakout.

    Yes, I'm joking - we can differ on whether the expansion of stupidity into the cosmos would be a good or bad thing compared to a mostly dead cosmos, and I don't really have an opinion on that. But the study is for real, and worth checking out:

    • Hugh G. Lewis and Donald J. Kessler, Critical number of spacecraft in low Earth orbit: a new assessment of the stability of the orbital debris environment, https://conference.sdo.esoc.esa.int/proceedings/sdc9/paper/305/SDC9-paper305.pdf

    Thanks to @michael_w_busch for pointing this out.

    (1/2)

    In conversation about a month ago from mathstodon.xyz permalink
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.