Screenshot of the US ruling: Apple willfully chose not to comply with this Courts Injunction. It did so with the express intent to create new anticompetitive barriers which would, by design and in effect, maintain a valued revenue stream; a revenue stream previously found to be anticompetitive. That it thought this Court would tolerate such insubordination was a gross miscalculation. As always, the cover- up made it worse. For this Court, there is no second bite at the apple. IT IS SO ORDERED.” Dated: April 30, 2025 Le fgetolflecs YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/114/484/927/218/692/470/original/228ffc0ed6593626.png