“The fallacy in the Defendants' argument is twofold. First, in the 'immigration context' as it were, …facilitating return of those wrongly deported can & has included more extensive governmental efforts, endorsed in prior precedent & DHS publications' Thus, the Court cannot credit that "facilitating" the ordered relief is as limited as Defendants suggest. Second, & more fundamentally, Defendants appear to have done nothing to aid in Abrego Garcia's release from custody & return to the United States to "ensure that his case is handled as it would have been" but for Defendants' wrongful expulsion of him. …Thus, Defendants' attempt to skirt this issue by redefining "facilitate" runs contrary to law & logic.”
https://s3.masto.ai/media_attachments/files/114/344/387/864/464/150/original/2532abe822e6bf82.png