Public
- Public
- Network
- Groups
- Featured
- Popular
- People

A screenshot of a message bubble in #Conversations_im with the text: Hi. I'm refactoring how URIs are linked in Conversations. We now support more URI schemes like mailto:user@example.com and tel:+1-269-555-0107 and obviously maintain support for things like xmpp:conversations@conference.siacs.eu?join and https://example.com however we no longer link domains that aren't actual URIs like example.com to avoid some false positives. the mailto, the tel, the xmpp and the https links are underlined to signal that those are clickable links.

Download link

A screenshot of a message bubble in #Conversations_im with the text: Hi. I'm refactoring how URIs are linked in Conversations. We now support more URI schemes like mailto:user@example.com and tel:+1-269-555-0107 and obviously maintain support for things like xmpp:conversations@conference.siacs.eu?join and https://example.com however we no longer link domains that aren't actual URIs like example.com to avoid some false positives. the mailto, the tel, the xmpp and the https links are underlined to signal that those are clickable links.
https://gultsch.social/system/media_attachments/files/114/240/273/790/587/458/original/857480399d8a2b8a.png

Notices where this attachment appears

Embed this notice
Daniel Gultsch (daniel@gultsch.social)'s status on Friday, 28-Mar-2025 22:41:02 JST Daniel Gultsch

For the next #Conversations_im release I’m refactoring how URIs are linked / made clickable. I’m adding a bunch of URI schemes like tel and mailto on top of the existing xmpp, http(s) and geo but removing support for "things that look like web URLs but aren’t actually URIs" (like 'example.com') to avoid some false positives.
Once the 2.18.0-beta comes out tomorrow or so let me know if you see things that isn’t matched and should be matched or vice versa.

In conversation about a month ago from gultsch.social permalink