Untitled attachment

Notices where this attachment appears

1. Embed this notice
   Radek Czajka (rcz@101010.pl)'s status on Friday, 10-Jan-2025 20:29:14 JST Radek Czajka

   in reply to

   @rysiek
   Yes, I am very clear that political discussion around sex-based spaces, sports etc., including advocates for such spaces, should definitely be allowed as political speech — whether you agree with these advocates or not.

   EFF is very clear that these voices shouldn't be allowed. I take it that you agree with EFF's position here, which is for not allowing such voices.

   I do respect the belief there are “better solutions” for specific issues and that these advocates are incorrect. You might be correct on this. As you say, we don't have to into a long debate. People can disagree.

   I do not respect the attempts to silence such disagreement.

   BTW, this stance would seem to mean that even just saying that yesterday's federal court decision was correct (https://adfmedialegalfiles.blob.core.windows.net/files/TennesseeAppellateOpinion.pdf) would seem to cross such narrowly defined line of acceptable speech, as it involves arguments for sex-based spaces. This is a very weird understanding of “freedom of expression”. EFF should just ditch this term if this is their stance on it.