I agree that a lot of nerds don't even like women, or see them as equal human beings with their own agency.
But I think the nerd form of misogyny is both more possessive and more dangerous.
Eg, in my lived experience, nerd answers on these questions are significantly worse than athlete answers:
* Should women have reproductive rights?
* Is child marriage OK?
* Should society "assign" women to men as partners? Or let women choose?
These are truly dangerous and possessive misogynistic ideas, turning into dangerous and possessive laws and actions. More athletes choose the reasonable answers. Laws eroding women's reproductive rights, and legalising child marriage, and "intellectual" conversations around removing women's rights to even choose a partner, are coming from nerds, not jocks.
@nazokiyoubinbou @cavyherd @VampiresAndRobots @futurebird
That lossiness can be dangerous.
Eg, you're describing the Lois Gibson algorithm. You give Lois about 0.5K of text, and she produces a 1 MB image.
https://m.youtube.com/shorts/8khZx8W-ZH0
But really, you're providing much more than 0.5k of text. She's interpreting your voice and your facial expressions too.
Danger: everyone measures the success of sketch artists by convictions. Not by accuracy.😮
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.