Untitled attachment

Notices where this attachment appears

1. Embed this notice
   @reiver ⊼ (Charles) :batman: (reiver@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 24-Mar-2025 06:42:27 JST @reiver ⊼ (Charles) :batman:

   in reply to

   Talking about using Blueskt social-graph to have content on day 1.

   So, deal with the chicken-and-the-egg problem — of audience and content.

   #ATmosphereConf

2. Embed this notice
   matiu bidule (matiu_bidule@mamot.fr)'s status on Monday, 06-Jan-2025 16:54:32 JST matiu bidule

   #Climat
   #ClimatCrisis
   #ClimatChange
   #Ecology
   #EcologyWithoutClassConflictIsJustGardening
   #Capitalism
   #CapitalismRuinsEverything
   #LateStageCapitalism

   And we know that all that shit is caused by capitalism since day 1.

   So yeah, we know that feel, bro…

   Via > @petergleick 🔗 https://fediscience.org/users/petergleick/statuses/110201237890079362
   -
   Climate scientists, every goddam day.

3. Embed this notice
   AJ Sadauskas (ajsadauskas@social.vivaldi.net)'s status on Saturday, 23-Nov-2024 15:40:23 JST AJ Sadauskas

   in reply to

   @14mission @Alon @mekkaokereke The average in Australia is 1.1–1.2 passengers per car.

   I haven't checked, but would imagine the average would be similar in the US.

   So if you have a lift that carries 1 car per minute, that's just 60 cars per hour. Which means, on average, 66 – 72 passengers per hour.

   For context, a single articulated bus seats around 75 passengers; Sydney's trams carry up to 400 passengers.

   But it's worse than that.

   Because in his future, he wants robotaxis, which potentially drop the passengers per car below 1.

   So at, say, .9 average passengers per car (something that can't be achieved without robotaxis), 60 cars an hour turns into just 54 human passengers.