An absolutely no-one-ever-reviewed patch, not even by the maintainers who got removed themselves - at least not on the mailing list. Then the patch just got slipped into an unrelated subsystem pull request, and got pulled by Torvalds with not even a comment. What about the next time? Who next would be removed from the MAINTAINERS file, the kernel.org infrastructure? What if the compliance requires another XZ backdoor to be developed without further explanation? Is the kernel development process still done in public? Are the "compliance requirements" documented on docs.kernel.org? Who are responsible for them? Are all that are responsible employees of The Linux Foundation, which is regulated by the U.S. legislature?
https://s3.eu-central-1.wasabisys.com/lor-sh/lor-sh/media_attachments/files/113/355/964/354/897/290/original/5b1ce5447bf00f7a.png
dump_stack()
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the 