Untitled attachment

Notices where this attachment appears

1. Embed this notice
   Liam Proven (lproven@social.vivaldi.net)'s status on Wednesday, 24-Dec-2025 02:16:28 JST Liam Proven

   The @distrowatch end-of-year roundup does not pull its punches, in an admirable way:

   «
   Some distributions, particularly the commercial projects, shifted focus this year, discarding useful tools and replacing them with AI buzzwords, less capable installers, and broken core packages. We saw Red Hat/Fedora discard an old, functional installer for a limited, broken replacement while introducing a barely functional AI chatbot into Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Ubuntu swapped out its tried and true GNU core utilities for less functional Rust alternatives while also breaking Flatpak packages. Meanwhile, openSUSE threw away its famous YaST system administration tools and brought in a system installer which barely works.

   It's been a bleak year if you're a user of commercially-backed Linux distributions. Programs licensed as free software are being replaced by more liberally licensed alternatives, AI slop is being hyped as a main selling point, and powerful administrative tools are being replaced by watered down web-based alternatives.
   »

   https://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20251222

2. Embed this notice
   Randahl Fink (randahl@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 01-Dec-2025 21:19:03 JST Randahl Fink

   Trump realizing that the shooter in Washington D. C. was Afghan, and then immediately moving to deport everyone from what Trump calls "third world countries", is a sad example of how the racist mind works.

   It is the equivalent of deporting everyone named Brian, if one guy named Brian murdered someone.

   I hope Trump does not notice, the murderer has black hair, because 85 percent of the US population has it, and that is a lot of deportations.

3. Embed this notice
   Veronica Jupiter (reiayanami@aus.social)'s status on Monday, 24-Nov-2025 16:04:44 JST Veronica Jupiter

   Last year, I wrote about how Google Scholar was one of the few remaining instances where search works.

   It is not perfect. But it works especially if you know the specific keyword that you are up to.

   Google included AI on Google Scholar, which as they claim will

   "analyzes [sic] your question to identify key topics, aspects and relationships, then searches all of them on Scholar"

   So in simpler terms, you are expected to type your research question/s and it will come back to you with papers relevant to your work.

   Sounds good? Sure, if youre only looking for papers to back up your Dunning Kruger.

   But that is NOT how research works. I cant remember how many back and forth I have had with my research arguments because I found a strong counterargument. That is what makes research research.

   You are not just living in your vivid hallucinations that your premise is gospel from the beginning. You are researching to PROVE, DISPROVE (quanti) or EXPLAIN (quali).

   Out of curiosity, I tried it:

4. Embed this notice
   HistoPol (#HP) 🏴 🇺🇸 🏴 (histopol@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 20-Jul-2025 04:04:35 JST HistoPol (#HP) 🏴 🇺🇸 🏴

   in reply to

   @SnowyCA @monotonehell @dgar

   Boy, that was no glitch, but a major f...

   Anyway, this thread was important to me, so I invested another half hour to fix it.

   Hope it works.

   It is a 5-post-thread now. 😁

5. Embed this notice
   JA Westenberg (daojoan@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 21-May-2025 14:59:47 JST JA Westenberg

   It’s not just that Trump officials don’t know how government works.

   It’s that they think you are the fool for expecting them to.

   https://www.theindex.media/the-unlearning-of-america/

6. Embed this notice
   Urzl (gooba42@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Apr-2025 21:46:59 JST Urzl

   in reply to

   @br00t4c I don't have to know them personally to respect them. That's how human decency works.

   It seems like media personalities whose job is to talk to the public should make a point of studying the things they're talking about rather than actively defending ignorance as though it were noble.