McCombsShaw1972--agenda_setting.pdf
Notices where this attachment appears
-
Embed this notice
@strypey @jeffcliff @sj_zero
> I could just say Convicted Felon, which would be a neutral statement of fact.
There is no such thing; you ought to know that. If I refer to Biden as "that crackhead's dad" or "the senile child-molester", these are facts, but "It's true!" does not mean it's neutral, and which things you decide to highlight are *more* relevant than the stance you take. See attached. So please, don't screw with me, man: it's one thing to talk, it's another to stretch my credibility and insult my intelligence, and it makes it difficult to assume good faith.
> Mumbling Joe.
"Child-Rapist Joe", if you were trying to make the point effectively.
> But faced with a binary choice that includes Pinochet, you pick the other one.
We're not anywhere near Pinochet vs. Allende, which was my initial point: you do not appear to have a reasonable understanding of US politics.
McCombsShaw1972--agenda_setting.pdf