• Public

  • Public
  • Network
  • Groups
  • Featured
  • Popular
  • People

This case arises from a complaint filed under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA” or “the Act”), 42 U.S.C § 9610, and the implementing regulations found at 29 C.F.R. Part 24. The matter was assigned to this Tribunal on March 11, 2024, and a preliminary conference call was held on March 25, 2024, during which Complainant expressed a desire to amend her complaint. Complainant filed a Motion to Amend the Complaint (“Mot.”) on April 2, 2024, along with a Memorandum in Support of the motion (“Compl. Memo.”), a Declaration (“Compl. Decl.”), and Exhibits A through S (“Compl. Exh.”). On April 16, 2024, Respondent filed its opposition to the motion (“Opp.”), a Declaration from one of its attorneys (“Perry Decl.”), and Exhibits A through D (“Resp. Exh.”). On May 1, 2024, as part of a larger opposition to a pending Motion to Dismiss from Respondent, Complainant objected to Respondents’ Exhibits A through D. On May 10, 2024, Respondent filed a response to Complainant’s objections.