@ErikvanStraten @letsencrypt Yeah, a security certificate doesn’t guarantee who owns a particular end point, only that the entity that controls it has access to the private key that was used when the certificate was issued so as to mitigate MITM attacks.
As far as the Small Web is concerned, that’s a fact of life we have to contend with (I’d much prefer a decentralised system like DANE had succeeded) but I definitely don’t want more hurdles and/or information. You want to be anonymous on your personal site? Go right ahead. There’s no reason to prove that a person quite possible exploring an aspect of themselves at rainbows-and-butterflies.org is actually Jane Someone.
We just have different use cases, basically.
It's 2030 -- the vast majority of Free software is being surreptitiously maintained by intelligence agencies, quietly and efficiently adding unglamorous features and maintenance while biding their time for an opportunity to deploy an undetectable backdoor.
They're all aware that other agencies are doing the same, so put significant effort into guarding against those attacks.
As a result, we are in a golden age of robust, secure, publicly funded free software...
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.