Untitled attachment

Notices where this attachment appears

1. Embed this notice
   🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Tuesday, 19-Mar-2024 08:51:21 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

   in reply to

   @libramoon

   But thats not what I asked. I didnt ask if they simply agree with if they feel its morally right. I asked if they need to do what they do with every single other disease, which is evaluate if treating the disease puts more life at risk than it saves.. you cant get cancer removed if it isnt actually a risk to your life. It isnt because the doctor "doesnt want to", its because medically a doctor must show that removing the cancer reduces the risk to the patient(s). They explicitly must evaluate the life and safety concerns, not simply "if they want to".

   Ergo I asked if abortions should be treated the same as cancer, that is, it will only be performed if there is actual medical risk to the patient.

   My view is no, it shouldnt be viewed the same as cancer... early on it should be removed regardless of risk, later on liffe and safety issues should be considered like they would with other ailments.

   As for your view, I'm not as clear on that. But it seems you think abortions should be considered a special case from all other disease too, but in this case that it should be exempt from considerations of risk to life and be purely the choice of the patient?