Public
- Public
- Network
- Groups
- Featured
- Popular
- People

wikipedia page for Rind et al. controversy. Explains how a peer reviewed meta analysis from 1997 came to the conclusion that CSA didnt cause any large scale harm so should be redefined and reconsidered in terms of legality.

Download link

wikipedia page for Rind et al. controversy. Explains how a peer reviewed meta analysis from 1997 came to the conclusion that CSA didnt cause any large scale harm so should be redefined and reconsidered in terms of legality.
https://assets.octodon.social/media_attachments/files/112/107/980/779/546/058/original/949fc3197b5b6386.png

Notices where this attachment appears

Embed this notice
CJ Bellwether (siege@octodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 17-Mar-2024 08:47:45 JST CJ Bellwether
in reply to

and just finally putting this here for bottom of the barrel evidence:
Bottom of their reddit account, yeah surprise its a pro-pedophilia account.

In conversation about a year ago from octodon.social permalink