Public
- Public
- Network
- Groups
- Featured
- Popular
- People

@mstublefield.eth 3d It'd be amazing to run polls/surveys online and ensure that every respondent was unique. Putting this on-chain doesn't achieve that though, does it? Because people could still create multiple accounts with a separate wallet for each and vote with each, right? Or am I missing something? @vocdoni 3d Only wallets that hold a DegenDAO OG and/or a Haberdashery NFT can vote. 1 token = 1 vote. The threshold will always be a % of total wallets, it doesn’t matter if the holders have them distributed in one or different wallets.

Download link

@mstublefield.eth 3d It'd be amazing to run polls/surveys online and ensure that every respondent was unique. Putting this on-chain doesn't achieve that though, does it? Because people could still create multiple accounts with a separate wallet for each and vote with each, right? Or am I missing something? @vocdoni 3d Only wallets that hold a DegenDAO OG and/or a Haberdashery NFT can vote. 1 token = 1 vote. The threshold will always be a % of total wallets, it doesn’t matter if the holders have them distributed in one or different wallets.
https://social-coop-media.ams3.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/media_attachments/files/112/043/479/598/870/110/original/4a71d62f382ca8ae.png

Notices where this attachment appears

Embed this notice
Jzero (guerillaontologist@social.coop)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Mar-2024 23:12:29 JST Jzero
in reply to

@ntnsndr Apart from my critiques of crypto in general, this example highlights a major problem for anyone interested in doing democracy on a public, permissionless blockchain: there's no good way to verify identities to prevent sock-puppeting, as this commenter points out. If you're only interested in 1 token = 1 vote (tokenocracy) then you don't need to care about how many wallets one person is voting with, but if you're a 1 person = 1 vote type then this is a big problem, seems to me.

In conversation Tuesday, 05-Mar-2024 23:12:29 JST from social.coop permalink