Public
- Public
- Network
- Groups
- Featured
- Popular
- People

A screenshot of a paragraph from the WIPO judgement. It reads: "Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s distinctive WHATTHREEWORDS trademark as the disputed domain name is aurally and visually similar to the WHATTHREEWORDS mark. In that regard, Complainant further contends that the terms “three” and “free” are phonetically identical and indistinguishable when enunciated."

Download link

A screenshot of a paragraph from the WIPO judgement. It reads: "Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s distinctive WHATTHREEWORDS trademark as the disputed domain name is aurally and visually similar to the WHATTHREEWORDS mark. In that regard, Complainant further contends that the terms “three” and “free” are phonetically identical and indistinguishable when enunciated."
https://assets.chaos.social/media_attachments/files/111/840/602/615/211/871/original/cbe50039b061ad78.png

Notices where this attachment appears

Embed this notice
Jonty Wareing (jonty@chaos.social)'s status on Tuesday, 30-Jan-2024 03:34:06 JST Jonty Wareing

Absolutely losing it after discovering what3words took control of the whatfreewords domain by arguing that "three" and "free" are indistinguishable when spoken.
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?case=D2019-2439

In conversation about 10 months ago from chaos.social permalink