@AncientGood You realize when you quote someone and leave out the one part that proves you wrong, you dont look smart, and you wont trick people.
The sentance I said that you left out that makes your response disconnected with mine was this very important sentance:
In fact even if he somehow managed to survive he deserved the exact same level of outrage.
So now all you showed is not only did you argue against a different point than I made, but you proved it was intentional, twice.
and somehow I am flapping my gums (by typing, I guess?) and not even trying to understand what you said?
Yes, both because you responded to a different argument than I made, and then when you quoted me left out the only sentence that made that clear.
“Classic Trump: say something crazy outrageous, neo-Nazi-like and it gets headlines, creates outrage.
So wait a little. Then say it again, no one notices, no coverage, and it gets normalized and mainstreamed.
Let’s be clear: migrants ‘poisoning the blood’ is Hitler rhetoric.”
~ Mehdi Hasan
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.