Public
- Public
- Network
- Groups
- Featured
- Popular
- People

Screencap: In their letter to the board, researchers flagged AI’s prowess and potential danger, the sources said without specifying the exact safety concerns noted in the letter. There has long been discussion among computer scientists about the danger posed by highly intelligent machines, for instance if they might decide that the destruction of humanity was in their interest.

Download link

Screencap: In their letter to the board, researchers flagged AI’s prowess and potential danger, the sources said without specifying the exact safety concerns noted in the letter. There has long been discussion among computer scientists about the danger posed by highly intelligent machines, for instance if they might decide that the destruction of humanity was in their interest.
https://cdn.masto.host/daircommunitysocial/media_attachments/files/111/464/021/981/786/640/original/6f8d20f959c6b36a.png

Notices where this attachment appears

Embed this notice
Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) (emilymbender@dair-community.social)'s status on Saturday, 25-Nov-2023 00:42:44 JST Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)
in reply to

Next stop: both-sides-ing reporting of "existential risk". OpenAI is deep within the TESCERAList cult. It's staffed by people who actually believe they're creating autonomous thinking machines, that humans might merge with one day, live as uploaded simulations, etc. 19/

In conversation about a year ago from dair-community.social permalink