Untitled attachment

Notices where this attachment appears

1. Embed this notice
   Moffin'tosh (moffintosh@berserker.town)'s status on Sunday, 15-Oct-2023 22:08:37 JST Moffin'tosh

   in reply to

   @Suiseiseki

   That's an incredible amount of complexity and attack surface, resulting it being impossible to write a non-trivial, secure program in that language.

   As if manual resource management is better, while is in fact worse.
   https://www.zdnet.com/article/chrome-70-of-all-security-bugs-are-memory-safety-issues
   https://www.zdnet.com/article/microsoft-70-percent-of-all-security-bugs-are-memory-safety-issues
   https://developer.okta.com/blog/2022/03/18/programming-security-and-why-rust#why-does-it-matter

   I don't really get the allure of static linking 1000 libraries, all full of vulnerabilities mainly due to the complexity of the language.

   You assume that somehow you'll be able to correctly reimplement the functionality you need better than projects which dedicate their all to produce sound code. Prove it.
   Also, why don't you also reimplement function calls while you're at it?

   Objects were a mistake and are incredibly slow (the CPU intel made with hardware accelerated OOP was very slow)

   That ain't what all objects are. That's only a kind of object, ie a reference object with dynamic dispatch