• Public

  • Public
  • Network
  • Groups
  • Featured
  • Popular
  • People

Second, the Government’s proposal to transport Mr. Bankman-Fried to the 500 Pearl Street cellblock two days per week and give him limited access to an internet-enabled laptop for six hours at a time does not compensate for Mr. Bankman-Fried’s otherwise severe lack of access to discovery and means to collaborate with his attorneys. Nor have the cellblock visits been anything like the boon to trial preparation that the Government makes them out to be. As the defense already noted to the Court (ECF No. 228 at 2), during two visits to the cellblock last week, the internet connection was down for over half of the visit—rendering the purpose of the visit largely moot—and slow for the remainder of the time. The computer battery also cannot be charged in the cellblock, an issue the Government proposes to address with a new battery that should last “approximately four hours” (ECF No. 238 at 5)—substantially short of the six-hour length of the cellblock visits. Moreover, when Mr. Bankman-Fried previously handed documents to BOP staff that he intended to review in the cellblock, the documents were never produced to him during his visit. Given these problems, it is hardly “remarkable” that Mr. Bankman-Fried did not wish to go through this process yet again in the absence of some assurance that such visits could actually be productive. But even if the Government’s promises to address these issues are borne out, the cellblock visits can at best provide only a small fraction of the internet