Untitled attachment

Notices where this attachment appears

1. Embed this notice
   HebrideanHecate (hebrideanhecate@spinster.xyz)'s status on Sunday, 23-Mar-2025 18:54:41 JST HebrideanHecate

   They really are trying to piss people off now, on purpose. Sacred castes are everywhere and hypocrisy.

   https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/primary-school-cancelling-easter-diversity-hampshire-b1218289.html#:~:text=Norwood%20Primary%20School%20in%20Eastleigh%20has%20cancelled%20both,respect%20the%20diverse%20religious%20beliefs%20within%20its%20community.

   A Hampshire primary school has axed its traditional Easter celebrations amid growing controversy over religious inclusivity.

   Norwood Primary School in Eastleigh has cancelled both its Easter Bonnet Parade and Easter Service, sparking a swift backlash from parents and social media users. In a letter to families, the school explained the decision was taken to respect the diverse religious beliefs within its community.

   In the letter, Miss Mander told parents: “We understand that the change may be disappointing to some, especially those who have cherished these traditions over the years. “However, we believe that this decision aligns with our values of inclusivity and respect for diversity.”

   The letter also states that the school, which has no religious affiliation, will be taking part in Refugee Week in June and working to become a School of Sanctuary.

   One critic branded the move an "utter disgrace" in a heated online response that has fuelled debate about the decision. “What you have done by cancelling Easter is outrageous, shame on you,” they added.

   Another user pointed out that that the school is continuing to promote Easter related activities on its Facebook page, despite cancelling its celebrations. He jokingly commented on one such post: “Happy Easter children, but don’t tell your head teacher.” Others asked whether the school would look to cancel Christmas next.

   Norwood Primary School has a “Respect for other faiths and beliefs” page on its website. It states: “Throughout the school year important celebrations in the lives of our children and school community are marked and celebrated together. These include EID, Diwali, Christmas and Easter.” It says that the schools timetable ensures that “children learn about key events in the British calendar and their importance in their lives.”

2. Embed this notice
   piefedadmin (piefedadmin@join.piefed.social)'s status on Thursday, 07-Mar-2024 17:00:21 JST piefedadmin

   Recently @siderea wrote a fantastic thread about social homogeneity, moderation, the design of social platforms and what they could be. They covered a lot of ground and I can’t respond to it all so I’ll just pick some highlights

   I cannot tell you how many conversations I have seen about the topic of “moderation” and how necessary it is in which nobody has ever bothered to set down what exactly it is that they think a moderator is supposed to accomplish.

   I mean, it’s all of them. I’ve been on the internet since the 1980s, and I have never seen anyone stop and actually talk about what they thought moderators were trying to do or should try to do.

   That sounds easy. I’ll take a shot at that, below.

   Also they draw a parallel between designing buildings and designing social platforms:

   Why should our societies tolerate the existence of *irresponsibly* designed and operated social media platforms, that increase violence and other antisocial behavior?

   Primarily buildings are built to be used, and as such they are tools, and we judge them, as we do all tools, by how fit they are for their purpose, whatever that might be.

   And the purposes of buildings are to afford various ways of people interacting or avoiding interacting.

   So architects think a lot about that. It’s a whole thing.

   Those who put together social media platforms need to think about the same sort of thing.

   Preach!

   The upshot is that we can do better than what we have in the past. We can go beyond the bare minimum of “delete the spam, ban the nazis” moderation. When we build social software the features it has will determine what kind of moderation is possible, what kind of interactions people will have. We should be intentional about that.

   I’d like to share some of my ideas for how we can do that but first, let’s get the basics covered:

   What I think a moderator is supposed to accomplish

   Obviously every online space is different and has it’s own values and priorities. What follows is what I consider to be the minimum necessary to avoid devolving into 4chan as soon as the normies arrive.

   The goal of moderators is to create a positive, inclusive, and constructive online community where users feel comfortable engaging in discussions and sharing their thoughts and ideas. To that end, their responsibilities include:

   1. Enforcing Community Guidelines:
      • Moderators ensure that users adhere to the forum’s rules and guidelines. This may involve removing or editing content that violates these rules.
   2. Fostering a Positive Atmosphere:
      • They work to create a welcoming and friendly atmosphere within the forum. This includes encouraging respectful communication and discouraging any form of harassment or bullying.
   3. Managing Conflict:
      • Moderators intervene when conflicts arise between users, helping to de-escalate situations and resolve disputes. This may involve mediating discussions or issuing warnings to users.
   4. Preventing Spam and Irrelevant Content:
      • They monitor the forum for spam, irrelevant content, or any form of disruptive behaviour. This helps maintain the quality of discussions and keeps the forum focused on its intended topics.
   5. Addressing Technical Issues:
      • Moderators often assist users with technical issues related to the forum platform. This includes addressing bugs, helping users navigate the site, and forwarding technical problems to the appropriate channels.
   6. Encouraging Positive Contributions:
      • Moderators actively encourage users to contribute positively to discussions. This can involve highlighting valuable contributions, providing constructive feedback, and recognizing members for their positive engagement.
   7. Applying Consequences:
      • When necessary, moderators may apply consequences for rule violations, such as issuing warnings, temporary suspensions, or permanent bans. This ensures accountability and helps maintain a healthy community.
   8. Staying Informed:
      • Moderators stay informed about the forum’s community and culture, as well as any changes in policies or guidelines. This helps them address issues effectively and stay responsive to the evolving needs of the community.
   9. Collaborating with Community Members:
      • Moderators listen to concerns and feedback from the community. Taking a collaborative approach helps build trust and ensures that the moderation team understands the community’s needs.

   Ok, cool. But:

   We can and should accomplish more

   When we think about moderation tools for a platform that serves millions of people, we are shaping the nature of social interactions on a grand scale. As we engineer these virtual societies, the question we need to ask ourselves is, “What is the nature of the society we want to create?” and within that, “What do we want moderation to accomplish that supports that nature?” and eventually “What software features do moderators need to do their work?”

   The nature of the society

   We want to create an ideal society where everyone is safe, respected, empowered, entertained and encouraged to grow and find meaning according to their individual free choices. Members of this online society contribute meaningfully and positively to the rest of society, support the actualisation of human rights for all and work to help democracy to live up to it’s promise.

   Remember the 1990s, when the internet hadn’t been corrupted yet? Yeah. I do.

   What we want moderation to accomplish to maintain this ideal society

   Defining the Role of Moderation

   Moderation should not be a passive, reactive role. Instead, it should be proactive, shaping the community’s social dynamics intentionally. The first step towards this is defining what our platforms aim to achieve. Do we want a space for free and open discussions, a supportive community, or a platform for specific interests? This vision will shape the guidelines we develop, the tools we use, and the strategies we implement.

   Developing Clear Guidelines and Empowering Moderators

   Once we have our vision, we need to create a set of rules that align with this vision. These guidelines should be clear, easily accessible, and comprehensive. Moreover, we need to empower our moderators with the right tools and authority to enforce these guidelines. This can include features for deleting posts, banning users, or moving discussions.

   Investing in Technology

   Incorporating technology is crucial in supporting our moderators. Automated moderation tools can detect and remove inappropriate content, while algorithms can promote high-quality posts. Technology can also help in combating challenges like trolls who use new IP addresses to create accounts. Techniques like browser fingerprinting can identify users regardless of their IP, and restrictions on new accounts can deter trolls.

   Addressing Complex Issues

   Online communities also need to grapple with complex issues such as the formation of high-control groups, disinformation propagation, social isolation, and internet addiction. Tackling these problems requires more advanced tools and strategies:

   • For high-control groups, we need to implement robust reporting systems and use AI tools to detect patterns of manipulation.
   • To combat disinformation, we need to establish strong fact-checking protocols, possibly collaborating with external fact-checking organizations.
   • To mitigate social isolation and internet addiction, platforms can implement features to promote healthier usage, like reminders to take breaks or limits on usage time.
   • To manage trolls, we can use advanced techniques that track users beyond their IP address and limit the activities of new accounts until they show they can be trusted.

   Continuous Evaluation and User Education

   Finally, moderation should be an ongoing process of improvement and adaptation. We need to regularly review and update our strategies based on their effectiveness and changing conditions. Additionally, we need to educate our users about these issues and how to report them. An informed user base can greatly aid in maintaining a healthy community.

   In conclusion, moderation in online communities is not just about maintaining order but about intentionally shaping the dynamics of these spaces. As we navigate the digital age, we must recognize the power and responsibility we hold in engineering these virtual societies, and use it to create healthier, safer, and more inclusive communities.

   https://join.piefed.social/2024/03/07/moderation-the-design-of-social-platforms/

   #culture #moderation #society

3. Embed this notice
   Stampeding Longhorn :budgie: (stampedinglonghorn@social.linux.pizza)'s status on Saturday, 24-Jun-2023 09:40:04 JST Stampeding Longhorn :budgie:

   For all of the newcomers here, here is my re- #introduction post.

   I'm a :linux: FOSS enthusiast who uses Budgie :budgie:, #cartophile, #roadgeek, and single (looking for a lady). I work in IT in a retirement community.

   In my spare time, I collect and read maps, go hiking, kayaking, camping, and other outdoor recreation, and play Euro Truck Simulator 2 and American Truck Simulator. I contribute data to OpenStreetMap whenever I can.

   Originally, I'm from Austin, Texas now in NW Pennsylvania.