@nigelharpur@mhoye What I recall is not so much surprise that it fell, but that it fell so gently. No coup, no armies marching. It just fell apart into constituent states. Which is not to say it didn't then get messy. But the all out warfare and violence didn't happen at once.
Which makes me wonder if our future isn't going to be similar. If this administration truly starts ignoring the courts, even the Supreme Court, will we just see many of the states start to just ignore the federal government and work things out amongst themselves?
❝ And lest there be any doubt about who was being targeted, says State Senator James Skoufis, whose district includes West Point, the ban knocked out the Vietnamese-American Cadet Association and the Native American Heritage Forum, but does not apply to the German Club, the French Forum, or the Polish Club. “Can you spot the difference?” Skoufis tweeted. ❞
And what possible reason does he have to access the system that the government uses to pay everyone? That contains private info on hundreds of million of people.
There's no rational reason to do so unless you're planning to use it to cut off payments for ideological reasons.
I keep thinking about the fact that the man who walked into Twitter and turned off random servers to make things "more efficient" is now doing the same thing to the United States government.
"responsible for distributing Social Security and Medicare benefits, salaries for federal personnel, payments to government contractors and grant recipients, and tax refunds, among tens of thousands of other functions"
❝ But what happens in the Industrial Revolution is that human effort gets embedded in a set of institutions — legal institutions, market institutions — that commodify it so that every hour of wage labor is equal to every other hour of wage labor and then sold on a market for a price.
And that’s an enormous transformation in the human experience — a total transformation in all social relations, political relations, economic relations and also, crucially, the subjective experience of being alive in the world.
I think something similar is happening with attention. And it started a while ago — the same way that the industrial revolution actually started earlier than we think. But we’re reaching a crescendo where attention is now this market commodity that’s extracted and sold. ❞
Do any of the non-DeltaDental ACA plans cover crowns? I didn't spend a lot of time comparing, because no matter where I've lived or worked, DeltaDental was the standard insurance. But it turns out the plan they offer doesn't cover crowns at all. And even if they did, the maximum they will pay for a year is $1000, which kes less than a new crown.
wahealthcarefinder.org would let me search for this, but only if I'm picking a new plan. There's no way to compare once you've picked a plan. (Why why why? I'm tempted to set up a dummy account just to find out. 🙄)
@Rycaut Yeah. Last year I gathered data from our health insurance expenses and used that to adjust our plan. Looks like this year I'll do the same for dental. We didn't have a plan last year because we were spending a few months in Mexico and that was far cheaper than anything we could do here.
❝ There is a clash going on in Britain between two fundamentally irreconcilable ideologies.
The NHS, DHSC, and many other official institutions like courts view transition as a response to a medical problem they call ‘gender dysphoria’ or ‘gender incongruence.’ From this starting point it seems appropriate that trans people have to get permission to transition: transness is a medical matter with inherent risks that ought to be controlled by “specialists.” Sometimes those specialists delay or deny permission, but that’s just part of the job. It also makes sense to ask which treatments are “most effective at treating dysphoria” and explore alternative treatments through trials, reviews, consultations, etc. I call this view ‘Pathologization.’
According to Pathologization, past treatments like electric shocks simply failed to alleviate patients’ dysphoria. These days we have more effective methods, and one day we might discover a cheap way of treating it without transition- a silver bullet conversion therapy. Doctors and managers will determine when and whether adjustments to the system are needed. Ideally they’ll engage with trans people in “stakeholder groups” but if those groups don’t get what they want that’s not a dealbreaker. Patients who suffer or die waiting are unfortunate but hey, the NHS can’t save everyone.
On the other hand, the view of an increasing number- especially young people and trans people ourselves- is that transition is a bit like pregnancy. It’s a process that may require professional assistance to bring to the happiest possible conclusion (whether completion or termination), and for this reason it is appropriate and necessary that the NHS is involved. But whether, how, and when to do it should be up to you. From this starting point there should be as few obstacles as possible: the role of doctors and managers is to facilitate and advise but never delay or deny. Prompt, reliable access to transition is a civil rights matter. I call this view ‘Freedom of Sex,’ a term borrowed from American writer Andrea Long Chu. ❞
I have moved my news reading habits back to the old web model, which is much less disruptive. Any time I see a site I'm interested in reading I add it to my RSS reader. Which I never open.
@skinnylatte Weirdly I've been getting lots of ads from a place that sells dresses that they claim (in videos) can hold a giant Stanley thermos in a pocket.