I don't like ruining the party, but someone's gotta point out the issues with LLMs, when they are being considered as a way to take notes and summarise during Working Group meetings.
🔗One of the most important things to understand about accessibility is how people use the web.
The HMRC accessibility team built these interactive personas that show what completing tasks is like on inaccessible services https://personas-prototype.herokuapp.com/
quick reminder that it is legal almost everywhere to make websites about literally anything.
I made this list of concerts that I went to, which serves litle purpose was fun to make (look up dates, memories etc) and build https://log.hidde.blog/live-music/
Personal update: as of yesterday, I've joined the CSS Working Group as an Invited Expert! Looking forward to try and contribute to the work and learn from this awesome group of people.
ACT-R CG, a group at W3C, basically interprets accessibility standards as testing rules. Yesterday they announced their “implementations” page, which shows their rules are used by various parties (like axe).
Wrote a short post about ACT Rules last night to celebrate!
Frontend and web accessibility specialist.Current: accessibility standards for the Dutch government. Before: W3C/WAI, Mozilla. Participant in Open UI CG, Accessibility Guidelines WG (W3C) and Human Factors TC (ETSI). Interested include: the web, web accessibility, standards, tech ethics, components, books, personal websites, CMSes, the video conferencing apps of our decade.