Notices by Lili Saintcrow (lilithsaintcrow@raggedfeathers.com)

The madness will continue until rich white men suffer real, actual consequences—social, financial, legal—for their actions. It’s that simple.

Coming into my mentions full of apologia for the rich is not recommended. Christ Jesus, respect yourself more, also, read the fucking room.

Boy, historians are just going to have a field day with all this.

An enchilada and two chocolates later, the world looks a little less grim.

Back to revising smutty vampires!

Because if a publisher is saying this publicly, Christ alone knows what’s going on privately.

…yeah, so, if a publisher is publicly saying, “We’ve spent out authors’ royalty money and can’t pay them without a loan or GFM”, that is HIGHLY concerning and I would take it as a sign NOT to do business with that publisher.

I would also, if I had already signed a contract with that publisher, seek professional advice about rights reversion, and a full independent audit of all sales.

Just as a beginning.

@herhandsmyhands Yep. It’s a goddamn business, and authors need to protect themselves.

"The more detainees, the more money they make. It stands to reason that these companies have no incentive to release people quickly."
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/19/canadian-detained-us-immigration-jasmine-mooney

"...Zuckerberg’s company is trying to muzzle yet another whistleblower — one who happens to have written a book full of alleged anecdotes about him and fellow Facebook executives that aren’t just embarrassing but also politically damning."
https://www.vox.com/technology/403954/facebook-whistleblower-book-zuckerberg-sandberg

It’s difficult to convey the breathtaking speed with which we decided, en masse, to punish the director who had attempted to force the script on us. We considered it a killing insult to be *scripted* after he’d made such a point of discouraging our active, authentic enjoyment.

The audience had responded to our authentic enjoyment of pieces we’d spent serious time refining. The enthusiasm was infectious.

The director mistook the window-dressing (our coordinated movements, a little play-acting during solos) as the reason for the response.

Anyway, we ruined the next competitions by being as soulless as possible. The following semester we all chose not to join the advanced choir again. We told other girls not to bother.

For the rest of our school careers, that director couldn’t get another advanced group together.

Decades ago I was in a small “advanced” choir. It was a point of fierce pride that we had to be selected and show proficiency to get in. We considered ourselves hardworking, relatively skilled.

One day, during practice, we started messing around.

We enjoyed a couple of songs we were practicing, and began spontaneously moving to the music. This was frowned upon in specific competitions, so our director tried to discourage it.

Unfortunately for the director, these weren’t competition pieces but regular parent-concert stuff. We understood the difference, and were unmanageable in the way only teen girls can manage.

Well, those concerts were a hit. The director was praised not only by parents but by other district choir directors, whereupon he made a second critical error.

He arrived at the next practice with a script.

He informed “his” choir that we would do “approved” moves with the next competition pieces.

Adult Lili understands he maybe meant well. Teen Lili was having none of it.

Now, I was defiant by dint of attempting to survive a brutal home life. The interesting thing here is that *every girl in the choir, no matter her background*, made the same decision near-instantaneously.

To wit: “Like hell we will.”

“AI” and fascism are both intrinsically incapable of authenticity, which is one of the main reasons why they will always (eventually) lose.

I learned this decades ago in a choir. Let me tell you the story…