Notices by Aldo (aldo2@gameliberty.club)

@LukeAlmighty

Explain to me like I'm a child.

Please.

Both the "right-wing" sides of the Russo-Ukrainian war are idiotic.

We mostly hear about the contradictions from the Russian side, and that's fair enough because they're the aggressor, they don't allow dissent and there are many of them.

But the far-right Ukrainians are also ridiculous.

1.) They claim the Russians are mystery meat Muslim Asiatic Mongolian for having non-Russians fighting alongside them, yet the Ukrainian side utilizes Chechen, Dagestani, Ingush and Tartar fighters (all Muslim and/or "Asiatic"). Regarding non-Muslim or non-Europeans, Ukraine utilizes Columbian volunteers and other Latin-Americans.

2.) They claim to be fighting against Russian Nazism, yet the ultra-right Ukrainians (and their European and even Russian allies) are Nazis themselves (some European ones basically "fled" to Ukraine to avoid prosecution in their own homelands), with the exact same Swastika/SS tattoos on them. They all use the same lingo online. Many of them are MAGA as well (which is ironic, given MAGA's tendency to support Russia), such as White Rex, the leader of the Russian Volunteer Corps. His Twitter feed could easily be mistaken for a MAGA feed. In this sense they feed directly into Russian propaganda efforts. They are "useful idiots" at best.

2.25) The Ukrainian SBU has contacts with many independent left-wing "AntiFascist" and "Anarchist" groups in Russia (NOT part of the Communist Party of Russia, which is effectively just another nationalist/revanchist party) and the occupied territories, and they are the ones providing coordinates for many of the strikes we have seen in the last few months. No Ukrainian ultranationalist or their supporters will aknowledge this because it doesn't align with their narrative that their war is against "leftist Communist Bolshevik imperialism".

2.5) Many Ukrainian ultranationalists are antisemitic in the same way the Russian and controlled-op Western MAGA/AfD etc... ultranationalists are. They are antisemitic Zionists who are Islamophobic, to put it plainly; they are "Western chauvinists". Also, the whole thing is very ironic, considering Israel behaves much like Serbia in international politics, even though Serbia is vilified as a pro-Russian stooge (anti-invasion, yet has not applied sanctions and maintains relatively strong ties with Russia).

3.) Both the Ukrainian and the Russian ultranationalists (and their supporters) utilize extremely incendiary homophobic rhetoric against each other. Both accuse each other of allowing/promoting "faggotry". Yet Ukraine is arguably more tolerant of sexual minorities than Russia is. That's just a fact. So, in a funny way, Ukrainian ultranationalists kinda want to be more like Russia (who they accuse of being "faggots" anyways). If you ask me, both groups of ultranationalists are repressing their sexuality, which is typical of "trad" "right-wing"ers.

Ukrainian "far-right" ultranationalists are actually HARMING Ukraine's cause. This war is not an ethnonationalist struggle against "Bolshevik Hordes" (no Ukrainian ultranationalist will ever tell you that the term "Bolshevik Horde" comes from White Russian Imperialist propaganda), but more akin to a liberationist independence struggle against imperialism. Why else have Azov et alii spent so much time and effort to distance themselves from the European "far-right" that 12 years ago they were playing friendly football matches with (including Russian ultranationalists)? They are following HTS's playbook from Syria. You don't gain "legitimacy" by becoming extreme racist Nazis with a narrow support-base. You gain legitimacy by appealing to all people.

Ironically, a left-wing lens is better at contextualizing the conflict than a right-wing lens. It dispells all the hypocrisy, dodging the "ethnic/race question" mire and just simply asks "who is the one being occupied and/or oppressed?". In that sense, the answer is obvious.

I'm just gonna say it.

The international "far-right" movement is a largely Russian-directed psy-op.

Even when they're fighting Russia, the goals/ideology aligns with Russia.

It's smoke and mirrors.

The "far-right" are patsies.

https://zaborona.com/en/the-national-policy-institute-has-compiled-a-dossier-accusing-sergei-korotkikh-of-working-for-russian-intelligence-services-the-dossiers-author-was-later-assaulted/

"Botsman", real name Sergei Korotkikh, has his own Wiki page where he's been tied to at least 3 murky murders. 2 of Belarusian opposition figures residing in Ukraine, and the other of a fellow Azov officer.

There is a theory that he is a double-agent.

This is not so far-fetched as, during the Cold War, the Western powers and the USSR employed double and even tripple agents against each other and had them remain in place for decades at a time.

Anyways, he now calls himself a "European Conservative" (hrm....where have I heard that before?) instead of a Neo-Nazi and looks to Hungary (one of the most pro-Russia nations in Europe, arguably even more-so than Serbia) as a model of a "healthy society".

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/5/9/ukraine-accuses-duo-of-running-hungarian-spy-network

@LukeAlmighty you are such a moron, it's honestly stupefying.

The U.K. is not an "Islamic state".

If the argument is that they want "AOC abolished", like you say, why are they bringing in biometric scanning to prove one is 18+ in order to go on Pornhub?

Your logic makes no sense.

Jfc man, stop being so fucking retarded.

@LukeAlmighty

Are you genuinely arguing that OfCom and the UK government are all Muslims?

Are you seriously arguing that?

Do you not see how retarded that makes you look, Luke?

This isn't about AOC, you fucktard. This is about privacy, personal freedom and tyranny.

Pornhub is installing "government-approved" age verification services in the UK. Biometric scanning, passport scans, ID scans etc...

"Some experts and digital rights groups, as well as porn providers themselves, are concerned that regulators' efforts to compel porn sites to verify the age of users could have privacy and security implications.

Civil liberties organisation the Open Rights Group is concerned the Online Safety Act age check requirements for platforms may introduce "a wide range of new cybersecurity risks for users," or even push children towards more dangerous sites."

Yet another example of Anglo-American Puritanism most likely ending up having the complete opposite effects.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cr5v2lz5vl6o

@LukeAlmighty how can you not see how stupid it is to come onto my posts to say "we can't have a discussion"?

What is wrong with you, you fat fucking flat-earth retard complains that no woman wants to date him fuckwit.

@LukeAlmighty

> "Not reading"

Yeah, we all know you can't read.

@LukeAlmighty wow cool you're so based hahaha "look, it's a song, hahaha Mike O'Tren, based!!!"

Fucking hell, you act like you're a Facebook poster, you fucking pissant.

@LukeAlmighty YOU FUCKING IDIOT.

This is just insane.

You a such a fuckwit, it's astounding.

READ WHAT I WROTE.

You are such a fucking retard, it's just unreal at this point.

@LukeAlmighty what is love the opposite of, Luke.

Love is the opposite of hate.

Therefore, you are arguing that fuckboys do not hate hoes.

AND I SAID THIS.

@LukeAlmighty

YOU COMPLETELY JUST MISREAD WHAT I WROTE.

I SAID THAT YOU WERE AGAINST AGAINST AGAINST FUCKBOYS HATING HOES.

WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU!??!!?

@LukeAlmighty you say:

1.) Fuckboys fuck hoes (I never denied this, and as I said, it shows your inability to engage in anything other than surface-level understandings)
2.) You then say that fuckboys love the fact that they fuck hoes
3.) You one moment say that you're against fuckboys "hating" hoes, but then hint that fuckboys are better than hoes by implying that it's fine to "treat them like meat" ("steak tartar").

I mean, dude, for the love of all that is holy.

STOP!

Look, do you want me to go over, in minute detail, the points I made in my post, along with the evidence?

I can do that, if you want me to.

How about we start with the point that Putin (who many NN/WNs support because he's "based" or whatever) prefers Israel over Iran? Do you want me to give you evidence of that?

@LukeAlmighty BWAHAHAHAHAHA

You are a fucking retard.

Once again.

In that thread you argue that fuckboys are good but hoes are bad.

I say that both are bad, you deny it, then you call me gay and say that I want to have sex with you out of nowhere.

Once again, you are PROJECTING.

You are the one who can't "discuss" anything with anyone who might disagree with them.

Furthermore, once again nowhere in that thread do I say or hint at or use synonyms for "if you disagree with me that means I'm right".

Your reasoning is literally the same as a "flat-earther". How can you not see this?

When you're provided with actual evidence, you freak out and insist that there's some nefarious plot against you or that the discussion isn't worth having.

@LukeAlmighty You literally linked to this exact same thread?

What?

The "proof" of me saying "if you disagree with me that proves I'm right" (what the fuck sort of flat-earth shit reasoning is this?) in my original post. Nowhere did I say that, or even imply it, or even use synonyms of it.

Are you saying that your disagreement with the points I was making is that I'm not antisemitic enough? I don't understand. You've given no evidence of me being wrong.

You then said that you didn't need to provide any because "you have proven yourself incapable of discussion".

You are a fucking retard, jfc.

Are you even reading this thread from top to bottom?

Every single time you think you did such a BASED OWN it turns out you just made yourself look like an idiot.

@LukeAlmighty you're the one who started this hahahaha fatty.

You gave no evidence of me saying what you claimed I said, then you said that I wasn't worth "discussing with" anyways.

You're the one projecting what you're doing onto me!

Go fucking workout man, jfc.

@LukeAlmighty you're fat.

@LukeAlmighty you're fat.

@LukeAlmighty lol

Where did I say "if you disagree with me you're proving me right"?

Point that out.

I'm saying if you support one, you support the others because they are literally in a symbiotic relationship.

Do you know what "symbiotic relationship" means?

Again, you give no evidence, I have a litany of evidence, yet you're the one arguing that I'm the one incapable of "discussion".

You're projecting as you always do.

YOU are the one wanting everyone to agree with your views without giving anyone any evidence whatsoever.

Just fuck off Luke, you're not even American, you've never been to the region, you're most likely not university-educated, you're just all around a shitstain.