Notices by Worthless Bums (worthlessbums@mastodon.social), page 2

otoh this might mean i have to re-evaluate pathfinder if it means 90% of these dickwads are just shouting that it's the best without ever having played it xD

"Because this adventure is combat-heavy, the group should include at least two fighters, preferably of levels 5-6 and armed with magical weapons."

this is the most specific advice i've seen a 2e module give me yet on what sort of party should do this lol

shoutout to the posters talking about bg3 builds that are literally impossible in the game because they never tried it

linking up with another adventuring party while starting a new module to introduce your definitely-not-in-danger-level-1's

"this dude can tom cruise edge of tomorrow you gl hf"

when you're a white person who only knows other white people

let us cater to the most toxic slice of our competitor is always a good strategy

lol

reading on pf1/2 history the thing i am 100% convinced about is that paizo only realized what a bunch of assholes they catered to with the release of pf2

i'm failing to understand this card reading game

🍆

for the white people afraid to ask the cops will think you stole the car

good luck to all the alt right corps out there

by which i mean die in a fire

dnd writers are bad because their lore doesn't match the arbitrary bullshit clanging around in my skull

there's an entire thread of people arguing about what an oathbreaker paladin is

that's one way to tax the wealth from my pcs xD

over at /r/dmacademy they're arguing over whether cantrips are better than martials if you wonder how serious that sub is

i wonder what percentage of dms are the fucking worst players lol

posters who spam their threads to multiple subs hoping to get the reaction they want always argue in good faith

that is what four decades of the internet has taught me

the high level concept of these rat ambushes are hilarious but super railroady and also pretty terribly written

reading about opend6