ugh, I'm starting to do video calls again and after re-arranging my desk I can't find a good place to put a webcam that isn't either looking at my nosehair or a straight profile view of me in front of my synth rack
postaram no grupo do zap um vídeo de um documentário de uma mulher que cheira a gasolina o tempo todo o dia inteiro faz 30 anos, e eu tô até agora impactado. como essa pessoa não morreu? Só o chumbo da gasolina devia ter matado ela por intoxicação faz tempo. essa merda é tóxica pra caralho. norte americano deve ter alguma coisa que protege contra burrice nesse nivel
💾 Hoje trago para a tag de backups um artefato pessoal: backup complementar, feito em um HD velho (mas confiável) que em 2021 eu substituí na sua função original.
Ele contém cópias extras de arquivos criados por mim e que eu não poderia substituir – fotos de família, textos e planilhas profissionais, produção acadêmica, artigos, comprovantes, contatos, etc.
É o backup do backup. Guardo junto com meus documentos, levaria junto em um incêndio.
Quando o good Alexandre Melo viu a imagem, foi jogado no Black Lodge e vai ficar preso lá pelos próximos 25 anos. Quem tá digitando isto é o evil Alexandre Melo.
Embed this noticeFrightening Darbzilla 🎃 ☁️ 🐉 (darbzilla@decayable.ink)'s status on Wednesday, 25-Feb-2026 01:34:25 JST
Frightening Darbzilla 🎃 ☁️ 🐉YOU KNOW THEY SAY ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL. BUT YOU LOOK AT ME AND YOU LOOK AT DREAMER AND YOU CAN SEE THAT STATEMENT IS NOT TRUE! SEE NORMALLY IF YOU GO 1 ON 1 WITH ANOTHER WRESTLER YOU GOT A 50/50 CHANCE OF WINNING! BUT I'M A GENETIC FREAK AND I'M NOT NORMAL! SO YOU GOT A 25% AT BEST AT BEAT ME! AND THEN YOU ADD FRANK TO THE MIX, YOU THE CHANCES OF WINNING DRASTIC GO DOWN! SEE THE 3 WAY AT SACRIFICE YOU GOT A 33 1/3 CHANCE OF WINNING. BUT I, I GOT A 66 2/3 CHANCE OF WINNING CAUSE FRANK KNOWS HE CAN'T BEAT ME AND HE'S NOT EVEN GONNA TRY! SO DREAMER YOU TAKE YOUR 33 1/3 CHANCE MINUS MY 25% CHANCE AND YOU GOT 8 1/3 CHANCE OF WINNING AT SACRIFICE. BUT THEN YOU TAKE MY 75% CHANCE OF WINNING IF WE WAS TO GO 1 ON 1 AND THEN ADD 66 2/3 %. I GOT A 141 2/3 CHANCE OF WINNING AT SACRIFICE! YOU SEE DREAMER?THE NUMBERS DON'T LIE AND THEY SPELL DISASTER FOR YOU AT SACRIFICE!
@Darbzilla Hey Darby, just as you always say: Big Poppa Pump has got your hook-up, the Maple Leaf Muscle is who you need to look up. Holler if ya hear that.
I can think of ways to represent the preference ordering for specific capabilities that need it, but I’ll wait to see your ordering proposal.
I don't have a proposal, I just wanted to steelman the argument for @list. Let's change it to @set.
Just for clarification, if a server implementation supports nodeinfo, for example, but it’s been disabled by a server admin, are you expecting a nodeinfo entry to be in the implements list or not?
NodeInfo support should not be advertised in this case, because this is a software capability. It is not possible to disable NodeInfo for a single user.
I’m not a fan of the MUST NOT. I would probably ignore that if I use the FEP. Inferencing is fine, but it’s too ill-defined and error-prone. If there were an FEP that describes specific valid inferences, I might have different opinion.
The top-level post MUST have a contextHistory property that refers to the conversation container. The presence of this property indicates that publisher implements conversation containers.
There is no need to add FEP-171b to implements array because this capability already has an indicator.
@libreoffice Sounds very interesting and important right now! Please don't forget that what makes the Google office tools so hard to not use are the good tools for collaboration. That's what's needed!
Developer perspective on tradeoffs… #ATProto architecture is more centralized. #ActivityPub has JSON-LD. ⚖️ So much pain and confusion, so little benefit and the Fedi Father refuses to consider JSON-LD alternatives because replacing the “feature” that almost no one actually uses with something useful will apparently break the Fediverse.
“This is why we can’t have nice things.” 😬#fedidevs
> There are paths out of the situation, but I'm not confident in the discourse around them right now, and hesitant about how much I want to engage with it.
Yes. I posted something on the same subject today.
@eyeinthesky I am pretty sure that nice things are within reach.
Fediverse-ActivityPub already significantly diverges from W3C-ActivityPub. I think eventually they will become completely different protocols, that just requires a bit of coordination among devs.
Not by ignoring it and pretending it isn't happening, and then funding it with my purchases.
I'm talking about it, trying keep my side of the street clean, mind and soul. I'm taking the small actions I can instead of waiting for big heroic actions to happen.
I may not be able to change anything but I don't have to be a part of it.
These stunning microscopic illustrations — from Martin Frobenius Ledermüller’s three-volume Microscopic Delights for the Mind and Eyes (1759–63) — offer spell-binding glimpses into the minutiae of the natural world: https://publicdomainreview.org/collection/microscopic-delights