Notices by Matthias Pfefferle (pfefferle@mastodon.social), page 12

@vsg_DE entschuldige die dumme frage, aber woher kommt das logo? 😳

@vsg_DE bzw. was wurde denn vorher benutzt? geht es um den blog user oder einen autor?

@vsg_DE 🤔 es gibt ne änderung die wir für Enable Mastodon Apps gemacht haben... ich schau mal ob die auch das zur folge hatte...

danke fürs bescheid sagen...

@janboddez @julien @mattwiebe no, not yet! I am thinking about scheduling for quite some time! It’s a tricky one!

@julien all fame on @mattwiebe 🙌

@trwnh ☺️😍

@MoritzGiessmann lass uns einen machen! /cc @depone 🥹

@alex if someone replies to your post, it will be stored as a classic WordPress comment and you can reply in the comment section.

@alexstandiford @alex this is a nice debugging tool, that shows what data mastodon uses: https://browser.pub/alex@standiford.us

you can see the webfinger in the result is the other domain :(

@alexstandiford @alex yes, mastodon follows all redirects and uses the latest handle in the stack.

@alexstandiford @alex sadly mastodon does not support redirecting or proxying of WebFinger handles :(

@morph theoretically it should work for every platform that supports the mastodon client api.

@alexstandiford @cdevroe the crossbooster? I think I have to implement a retry but otherwise it should work!

@alexstandiford @cdevroe you can already interact with comments using the blog profile. It is simply not possible to follow others yet.

I am also experimenting with auto boosting blog posts through a mastodon account https://github.com/pfefferle/wordpress-crossbooster

@mcv @yukijoou sure, overloading a different field is always bad!

or maybe it is because the WordPress plugin does not send an `as:sensitive: false` yet. we have a PR for that, I will try to release a new version to see if this will fix it. https://github.com/Automattic/wordpress-activitypub/pull/900

can I maybe ping you two, to run test on your instances @mcv @yukijoou ?

@mcv @yukijoou mastodon uses `as:sensitive` to check if the summary is a summary or a content warning. https://docs.joinmastodon.org/spec/activitypub/#sensitive

I really like the idea of the sensitive flag, because to use the summary as a synonym for content-warning harms the spec.

Maybe we have to file some issue!?!

@talksina @acambronero oh wait, no this is not part of the plugin! sorry, I thought you are referring to the reply links under a comment!

@talksina @acambronero it is part of the plugin.

@yukijoou what platform are you on? is it using the old mastodon way: simply use the summary as warning, without checking for the sensitive flag? https://docs.joinmastodon.org/spec/activitypub/#sensitive