@unsuspicious I do not like the phenomenon of hype(d) essays and reading. But I like the added angles and new iterations of thoughts when they add. My overtly snark (sorry!) comment came from this: the invisible commitee did not add, they even made it harder to discuss specific angles (i.e. the middle economic transition which is between supra-regional and the local points of focus). I did not yet get to read the desert text. Do you recommend a reading and if so: how come?
@savagegoose That said, climate alarmists sounded way off the first time I noticed them, and than way off when I looked at it more seriously (and their proposed solutions). I remain a future seeking socialist, a person that is shaped by the knowledge, that this world is created, and ruins are likely, but from the ruins you still can build new communities. Because that how it always happened. And I can not gripe the "it is too late" part. Too late for what? A nice future that will not be?
@savagegoose Because the Eugenics angle never was an interesting point. But maybe that's coming from the country of industrial murder, of Aktion T4 and weeding out eugenic argumentations in socialism pretty early.
"I am *so* bored by climate "now-or-never-ism". The climate 'movement' should better be called the climate echo chamber: it seems pathologically unable to learn from its decades-long communication failure" John thackara <3
This "make it or break it" communication does not bring the propagated effects. And it shows that public opinion matters more than actually working on solutions