not to suck @p 's dick about this but i legit think its good / noble that he does 'sketchy' things like ignore deletion requests + make blockbots flip out + make everyones dms public because i think ppl generally dont know how much activitypub sucks dick. afaict when he does this its p prominent + public knowledge + now everyone knows in the back of their mind that FSE doesnt honor delete requests so now you know thats a thing thats possible so its not a surprise if someone more malicious is doing that somewhere else
this might just be infosec brain damage for me cuz i just always enjoy a good proof of concept
basic idea is blockbots usable as activitypub signal amplifier
input -> you click the block button -> server needs to push messages out (im not positive now that i type this out if federation mandates pushing for all messages, but if tagging is involved like it usually is, then that is at least 2x amplification, if relays are involved then it gets much much larger)
so if you are generating a larger signal it turns it into a spam cannon you could use to clog up the originating server or send a ton of garbage to a single server in particular if you are involving multiple spambots
@KayFaraday@spiral@p meaning like - a single simple action causes an instance to send out multiple messages. and then you can load in, for example, a blocklist via csv which will send out several messages for every row
@KayFaraday@p@spiral so my point here is like, i even care about security but i would not have made it a priority to look into this
pete used it to temporarily bring down someones instance, it made a big scene, because it made a big scene i have a fairly decent idea of how it works + what other things might have a similar issue + a lot of attention is brought to it in general and most ppl are aware of it now
yeah i really dont understand why people are so fucking worked up about this, and i don't think they understand either? i think people just want to pretend that security/integrity is not something they have to think about when running a server and are annoyed that they suddenly have to think about it (esp considering neet's response when i said this lol)
turn fedi into a pvp zone. every time you get taken offline is a chance to learn something new about system adminstration. "Losing is fun!" - Toady one
> one small difference, his posts with "direct messages". everything else is exactly the same, he doesn't care about it being exploitable because he can't even fix his own code
i'll admit i haven't really dug into the code here but from my current understanding of the blockbots and what pete is doing, this doesn't sound exploitable in the same way because it's a single message sent to a single instance (or maybe it doesn't leave the instance if it's just for FSE users?)
but i'll say that i'd be interested in hearing if this is still exploitable! and a good way to make pete care would be to give him a taste of his own medicine and use it to fuck up FSE and give him a problem he needs to go fix immediately :)
the v8 javascript engine's jit had a bug where a range of numbers didn't include a "-0" when it should've included one. who even knows what a -0 is? who cares?
@rats_god@r@p are you running on openbsd? i’m noticing some weirdness on file uploads and am not positive if it’s an httpd max upload size issue or something with relayd i’m not aware of - i don’t think i remember this issue from last time i did this but maybe