Did anyone hear about bigtech investing in #nuclear energy to supposedly power 'ai'? here's a supposed article that sounds like it's copy-pasted straight from the nuclear lobby's press release (you can tell because they write "clean energy" as opposed to "toxic waste generating energy that poisons children and placed in bombs to damag the #genetics of people in parts of the world bankers want to harvest").
Amazon bought a nuclear-powered #datacenter in march and now they are investing $500 million in "small modular reactors". The nuclear lobby must be thrilled that everyone seems to be too distracted with the election to even talk about this. This news from amazon came a day after google announced it has big plans to go nuclear over the next decade or so.
in case anyone needed another reason to boycott m$, amaz, and goog....
“Three sets of American #laws are being violated by [#Biden-#Harris] delivering aid to #Israel. It is illegal to send aid to any country that is violating #humanrights, interfering with the delivery of humanitarian aid and not complying with the #nuclear weapons treaties — Israel is in violation of the Treaty On The Non-Proliferation Of Nuclear Weapons. On all three counts, providing #military aid to Israel is illegal.”
The #TechBros are copying the #FossilFools playbook by pretending that nuclear is a solution to their emissions problem, knowing that #nuclear (even new fission) plants are years away, giving them permission to continue relying on #FossilFuels for ‘just a little bit longer’.
The only difference is the techbros are dressing up their fantasy in sci-fi language because that’s what they do.
"Should a #Trump presidency reverse #US sanctions on #Russia, Europeans will need to be much more muscular in ... enforcement action & will no longer be able to hide behind Uncle Sam," he said.
…European countries were wrongfooted during Trump's last presidency, when the #UnitedStates reversed an international deal w/ #Iran over its #nuclear program & unilaterally reinstated #sanctions, leaving #Europe out on a limb.
Looks like Google is next to clamor for nuclear power in the "AI" energy consumptions arms race. This, since it bears repeating, is to power a technology that *everyone hates*, both because it's shit and because Google has used it to (among other things) technologically enable the Israeli genocide on Palestinians.
(And because this always also bears repeating, "AI tools" consume the amount of energy they consume precisely because they are not actually artificial intelligences.)
☢️ #NATO will hold a long-planned major #nuclear exercise next week, the alliance’s chief said Thursday, a few weeks after #Putin announced changes to #Russia’s nuclear doctrine to discourage Ukraine’s Western allies from supporting attacks on his country.
The #US should respond to every North Korean provocation by actively informing North Korean people of their dire #HumanRights situations, David Maxwell, VP of the Center for Asia Pacific Strategy, argued.
"If #NorthKorea conducts a missile test, the response should not just stop at condemning the act. #Kim's deliberate decision to prioritize #nuclear weapons & missiles is what is causing the suffering of the Korean people in the North."
on the one hand, it is a clean (relatively speaking) source of power, and all historical catastrophes were results of bureaucratic incompetence rather than technical limitations
on the other hand, nuclear technology goes hand-in-hand with nuclear weapons; bureaucratic incompetence is all but inevitable; and renewables exist
i'm looking to harvest opinions and discussion to help figure out where i stand... please boost and leave your thoughts!