Julius Schwartzenberg@alecm the relevance of the license relates to who owns the copyright. In Oracle's case the copyright was fully owned by them, so they could do whatever they wanted. In the case of Chrome, copyright is assigned to various KDE developers, Apple, etc.
There is not a single entity that can be bought so that one would own all the copyright on the entire codebase that makes up Chrome.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the