Glyph@mcc @halva I think that, definitionally, it is one? As an end user you require a license to use copyrighted software, and the GPL is the one you get. Some EULAs require that you explicitly accept because they know they are out on thin ice as a contract of adhesion, and the GPL is just saying you don’t have to do that for the license to apply to you. But the explicit-acceptance thing is an extra thing that licenses add, it is not clear to me that the GPL really *needs* to say this, functionally?
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.