@Humpleupagus @RMIV Kant and Heidegger were smart, but postmodernism would never have survived, let alone thrive, in an environment where the majority of heavy thinkers founded intelligibility and meaning on a personal, eternal, and omnipotent source. The Enlightenment, Romantic, and Modernist Continentals were partially responsible in eroding the commitment to Christianity among the intellectual class, which trickled into the White working and clergy classes with resulting spiritual malaise.

Derrida was a faggot kike, but he at least understood correctly that without that personal, eternal, and omnipotent source, it is every man for himself regarding knowledge and application of truth, goodness, and beauty. No carefully constructed worldview structures like the world of phenomena and noumena from Kant or the world of axioms and logic statements from Russell could change that.

The sanest "free thinker" was Nietzsche who understood godless worldviews and models don't matter if you can not enforce them on others, like how God will ultimately force the Christian worldview onto everyone in the end (see Phillippians 2:9-11, which is not a statement about universal salvific confession but the permanent and explicit defeat of any all anti-Christ philosophies and counter-claims). Derrida understood this too, except he didn't want Whites using that power while his fellow Jews, Frankfurt School and all, enforced their worldview on the current world, which again was a spiritual and intellectual White impotence partially and slowly caused by Kant, Hegel, Nietzsche, Russell, etc.