@roboneko Ah yes, yet another "open source" definition to add to my list.

I can confidently say that it isn't correct that everyone knows such definition, as most people don't even understand how derivative works, work.

The biggest problem with "open source" is that every single supporter either believes it means source-available or comes up with their own special definition.


GNU/Jihad against "FOSS"!


One of the reasons I'm a free software supporter is that such GNU/Camp has no problems in agreeing on what is free software.

Although people try to claim that free only means price, once you has grasped that free means freedom and proprietary things don't become free merely because they are gratis - you don't confuse free and gratis ever again.

Free can also be substituted with libre with no change in meaning either - "open source" can't do that.