Last bit of general thoughts on this.

She does touch a bit on the innate difference between men and women. I do find it interesting that the primary example she uses is the male predisposition for violence when we’ve just spent the past 30+ minutes talking about the importance of childbirth and the nuclear family. Ultimately, she only lingers on this point long enough for criticism of liberal feminism… primarily all the sex positivity stuff and prioritizing this idea of a career (rather than simply a job) over all other things… even though she also just pointed out the consequences of not having any representation in the halls of power.

It was pointed out that monogamous cultures statistically have lower rates of domestic violence than polygamous cultures. She also throws out the statistic that only 15% of the world has… how do she phrase it… rules that specify monogamy. Who are that 15%? Cultures that have a background of Christianity. Oh, and that divorce is worse on children than a parent dying. I’m not saying that there is zero truth in any of those statements. However, I also find her combination of viewpoints very convenient for a particularly familiar agenda.