@cyberspook >That's debatable.
It's not.
GNU ensures the software has freedom without fail and so that makes it the best.
The software also happens to be technologically the best usually, but that's just a nice bonus.
- BusyBox attempted to replace GNU coreutils and it sucks.
- clang/LLVM attempted to replace gcc and while it's neck and neck, gcc is still a better compiler.
- I can't find a shell as good as bash.
- GNU Linux-libre is better than Linux as it doesn't have proprietary malware.
- glibc is still the best libc although there have been a few attempts to write a good libc like musl.
- GNU has nano and emacs - superb editors.
- grub is the best bootloader you can get for AMD64.
I could go on, but that's enough.

>Claiming that all the GNU software is better than anything else is not exactly an unbiased claim
It's a biased but correct claim.
There is plenty of other free software that is excellent, but GNU's not comparable to that software, as there's no overlap.

>Not as cool as TempleOS but still.
TempleOS was written with the help of GNU software.