@phnt@fluffytail.org First the maintainer wants to dictate what music you can upload based on genre/band and then this.I've never heard about this. How do you mean?
@SuperDicq At this point they entered their destruction pipeline. First the maintainer wants to dictate what music you can upload based on genre/band and then this.
@radmin@limepeeps.perchinup.top Yeah there really is something particular about made using diffusion models because they are always instantly recognizable as such.
It's so strange because I can always immediately point out that an image "AI slop" but often I can't put into words why other than "I CAN TELL FROM SOME PIXELS AND SEEING QUITE A FEW SLOPS IN MY TIME"
But the fact that the developers are in favor of censorship shouldn't have to be a reason to avoid using Funkwhale however, it is easy to revert this specific change on your own Funkwhale instance. That's why I like free software.
@phnt@fluffytail.org Having something "hardcoded" in an a free software application, especially if it written in a higher level interpreted language such as Python really is quite trivial.
This is the same as Mastodon having a "hardcoded" 500 character limit, because of Gargamel's autistic vision or something, but every Mastodon instance changes this value anyways.
I know its le cloud music but you but you could just use jellyfin or navidrome or vlc or ampache or GNU MediaGoblin.
I know funkwhale and MediaGoblin are nominally on the fediverse though I don't really get what that really means. (I mean WordPress is fediverse too :^) )
Funkwhale does support it, and you can actually interact with Funkwhale accounts from the fediverse.
That's the real difference I think. Funkwhale is trying to make an actual social network around music as a replacement for Soundcloud, while GNU MediaGoblin is just a convenient server application.
@cwebber@social.coop, one of the authors of the ActivityPub protocol also happens to be one of the original authors of MediaGoblin, but MediaGoblin has never supported ActivityPub.