Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Anime Wong (elliptica@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2023 06:53:03 JST Anime Wong

   in reply to

   • ArdainianRight
   • Lichelord Godfrey
   • Leaf Lord
   @lichelordgodfrey @Leaflord @ArdainianRight Brazil, as far as I know, was a hell hole. A vast majority of the slaves brought over died, and were worked incredibly rough.
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2023 06:53:03 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • ArdainianRight
     • Lichelord Godfrey
     • Leaf Lord
     Strange. Jews owned 40% of the plantations in Brazil. I'm sure it's a coincidence.
   • Embed this notice
     Anime Wong (elliptica@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2023 06:53:04 JST Anime Wong

     in reply to

     • ArdainianRight
     • Leaf Lord
     @Leaflord @ArdainianRight I think that's the thing. The type of slavery we saw in Europe (debt slaves, indentured slaves, peasants, serfs) were significantly different from the slaves we saw in places like Brazil and to some extent North America.
   • Embed this notice
     Lichelord Godfrey (lichelordgodfrey@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2023 06:53:04 JST Lichelord Godfrey

     in reply to

     • ArdainianRight
     • Leaf Lord

     @Elliptica @Leaflord @ArdainianRight Slaves in North America ate better and had better accommodations on average compared to the White working class of the time. You would have to go to some jew who owned slaves to see abuse, as they’re the ones who required their male slaves to be circumcised, or alongside the Arabs across the sea, castrated.

     I don’t know enough about Brazil or the rest of the Americas on slavery in general. I do know it’s unironically an anti-White blood libel by jews to claim that the few Whites who owned slaves in the USA were abusive. If anything, they were negrophilic, but in a paternalistic way rather than thinking they were “the same as us”.

   • Embed this notice
     Leaf Lord (leaflord@leafposter.club)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2023 06:53:05 JST Leaf Lord

     in reply to

     • ArdainianRight
     The condition of one's slaves is a direct reflection of the master's household. Just like a lord has duties and obligations to his serfs, so too does the master have them to his slaves.
   • Embed this notice
     Anime Wong (elliptica@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2023 06:53:06 JST Anime Wong

     in reply to

     • ArdainianRight
     @ArdainianRight I've not looked too much into this part of history, but I do find it odd that Europe pretty much abolished slavery within it's own borders, while they let it slide and even partook in it within it's many colonies.
   • Embed this notice
     ArdainianRight (ardainianright@detroitriotcity.com)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2023 06:53:06 JST ArdainianRight

     in reply to
     @Elliptica Slavery at different points in time was considered an extension of natural hierarchies, in which one would have dominion over another, but still be morally accountable to God in their treatment of them. In our democratic age such notions of responsible leadership are foreign, and those in power feel entitled to do as much as they can with said power that they can get away with. That's one area in which the democratization of the world has not been entirely positive.
   • Embed this notice
     ArdainianRight (ardainianright@detroitriotcity.com)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2023 06:53:07 JST ArdainianRight

     in reply to

     • ArdainianRight
     Also in many cases people in bygone eras did dislike slavery and genocide, it's just that making observations and having opinions about different groups of people being thought of as "the worst thing imaginable" is a purely modern and absurd contrivance.
   • Embed this notice
     ArdainianRight (ardainianright@detroitriotcity.com)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2023 06:53:08 JST ArdainianRight
     https://twitter.com/bad_histories/status/1672745455170535426 It always comes back to that, doesn't it. Also it's curious how racial prejudice doesn't really factor much into morality until the 1960s onward, hence the need to apologize for the time period rather than question modern morality.