I don't like trannies, but all drugs should be otc. A system that controls substances like ours does requires that you use state controlled doctors to access substances the state controls and under the rules and for the purposes they allow. You really can't have it both ways, your either pro-globohomo medical tyranny or you're not. 🤷♂️
@Ariovistus calls me jewish, but he probably also believes that the government should be able to listen into your private conversations and tap your wires at will to stop crime like they do in Israel. What a kike.
I agree. The law should be simple. That men need lawyers suggests that something is amiss. How can laymen be held accountable for there legal transgression when they don't understand the law, and the lawyer is guessing?
But there is a difference. You can represent yourself. If the law was like medicine, you'd be required to get the advice and approval of a lawyer when entering into certain types of contracts, like to purchase a car, and you'd be required to purchase insurance to pay for it. We have far more legal freedom than medical freedom.
I agree. I would no more stop a man from consulting a physician than consulting a lawyer, and I would even advise that you do. But that is far different than controlling access. Again, going back to my legal analogy, if we had the same policy with contracts and lawyers, would you make the same argument... that you must acquire a lawyers approval because they are experts?
The elephant has a point - you can completely represent yourself legally, but can't self-determine your own medication without government authorized approval.
Jews aren't libertarian, they're communists. They believe that the government decides what's best, and how and when and to whom commodities are distributed. You're actually arguing the Jewish position.
no you don’t understand, the AMA and CDC dick sucking doctor is a critical safeguard against misuse of drugs, that’s why very, very few people are on HRT!
Yes, that you can possess a substance, does not entail that there can't be consequences for misuse. Disturbing the peace and public intoxication can still be illegal. And I still think substances should be used for the right reasons and under the right conditions, my issue is about who controls the access and the costs of that. If someone has a simple disease that only requires a pill that costs $ .10/day. A $1800/mo health insurance policy and a $500 doctor visit every month is a huge tax, even if it's hidden on the employers books.
If doctors had to fight to get patients because they were only consultants, the fees would drop significantly, and for long term diseases with which patients become familiar, they'd become absolutely unnecessary.
In addition, doctors don't necessarily always do what is right for the patient, and often ignore patient complaints, while controlling access to labs and even access to specialists. There are good doctors, but they are few and far between.
I would also add that I would be against pharmacies being licensed (to avoid hoarding and resale and to control quality).
@spitfire@Humpleupagus@Ariovistus@Shadowman311 ironically enough with otc drugs it would likely be the opposite. I can purchase alcohol without special approval but I can't drink it in the street (unless I'm in a really bad part of town, anyway)
On the topic of professional associations, I found this graphic the other day. This is particularly scary because they want to do this to children who barely have comprehension of the world around them.
I am so tired of these predators now taking prominent places of authority. No half measure is appropriate. If you are a parent or ever desire to have your own family, you must have the capacity for violence - you must organize with other parents who think likewise. There are more than you would think, but almost any respectable parent will lay their life down in defense of their spawn.