Last year, I wrote about how Google Scholar was one of the few remaining instances where search works.<\/p>
It is not perfect. But it works especially if you know the specific keyword that you are up to. <\/p>
Google included AI on Google Scholar, which as they claim will<\/p>
\"analyzes [sic] your question to identify key topics, aspects and relationships, then searches all of them on Scholar\"<\/p>
So in simpler terms, you are expected to type your research question\/s and it will come back to you with papers relevant to your work.<\/p>
Sounds good? Sure, if youre only looking for papers to back up your Dunning Kruger.<\/p>
But that is NOT how research works. I cant remember how many back and forth I have had with my research arguments because I found a strong counterargument. That is what makes research research.<\/p>
You are not just living in your vivid hallucinations that your premise is gospel from the beginning. You are researching to PROVE, DISPROVE (quanti) or EXPLAIN (quali).<\/p>
Out of curiosity, I tried it:<\/p>","generator":{"id":"tag:gnusocial.jp,2026-07-19:notice-source:ActivityPub","objectType":"application","status_net":{"source_code":"ActivityPub"}},"id":"https:\/\/aus.social\/users\/reiayanami\/statuses\/115603068077428397","object":{"id":"https:\/\/aus.social\/users\/reiayanami\/statuses\/115603068077428397","objectType":"note","content":"
Last year, I wrote about how Google Scholar was one of the few remaining instances where search works.<\/p>
It is not perfect. But it works especially if you know the specific keyword that you are up to. <\/p>
Google included AI on Google Scholar, which as they claim will<\/p>
\"analyzes [sic] your question to identify key topics, aspects and relationships, then searches all of them on Scholar\"<\/p>
So in simpler terms, you are expected to type your research question\/s and it will come back to you with papers relevant to your work.<\/p>
Sounds good? Sure, if youre only looking for papers to back up your Dunning Kruger.<\/p>
But that is NOT how research works. I cant remember how many back and forth I have had with my research arguments because I found a strong counterargument. That is what makes research research.<\/p>
You are not just living in your vivid hallucinations that your premise is gospel from the beginning. You are researching to PROVE, DISPROVE (quanti) or EXPLAIN (quali).<\/p>
Out of curiosity, I tried it:<\/p>","url":"https:\/\/aus.social\/@reiayanami\/115603068077428397","status_net":{"notice_id":null}},"to":[{"objectType":"http:\/\/activitystrea.ms\/schema\/1.0\/collection","id":"http:\/\/activityschema.org\/collection\/public"}],"status_net":{"conversation":"tag:gnusocial.jp,2025-11-24:objectType=thread:nonce=c98392379a443335","notice_info":{"local_id":"11578950","source":"ActivityPub"}},"published":"2025-11-24T07:04:44+00:00","provider":{"objectType":"service","displayName":"GNU social JP","url":"https:\/\/gnusocial.jp\/"},"verb":"post","url":"https:\/\/aus.social\/@reiayanami\/115603068077428397"}],"links":[{"url":"https:\/\/gnusocial.jp\/conversation\/5892103","rel":"alternate","type":"text\/html"}]}